The fog of war

ONE year after the Georgian war, its outcome is as debatable as the cause. Depending on where you stand, the war can be seen as the sinister culmination of a systematic provocation by a neo-imperialist Russia or as a murderously aggressive gambit by a Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via AllTop, The Economist
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: War, Europe, Russia
Stats Help
# Tweets: 4 (as of 2009-08-13)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Aug 13, 2009 - 6:26 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
James Canning
4.0
by James Canning - Aug. 13, 2009

Good quick read. Sarkozy deserves more praise than given in this article, and the agreement could not have been achieved if more specificity had been demanded. Timeslines are available and they show Saakashvili started the war, blundering badly. The article does not mention the role G W Bush's arrogance played in bringing about the war; Putin had told Bush Georgia was not going to be allowed to impose a military "solution" to the separatist "problem" in South Ossetia. Bush ignored the warning, and Condi Rice botched the job too.

Saakashvili's fat-headedness brought about a near-disaster, that both hurt and helped Russia, but certainly hurt Georgia. The US and EU taxpayers have also been injured by Saakashvili's recklessness.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (21% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Information
3.5
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
3.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!