It is - in a sense - good journalism. It's journalism in the sense that this story is NOT the same thing as the garbage that so many of those who call themselves journalists these days produce - a product most of them are pushing because their wealthy corporate owners see Clinton vs Giuliani as the best bloodsport for ratings/circulation in 2008. This story is journalism because - while it may already state things that most of us know - it frames the argument more fully, instead of just saying "Hillary isn't electable." Is it textbook "good journalism"? Hardly. But when so much of the ramblings of so-called journalists these days are simply words designed to keep them employed by their right-wing leaning corporate masters, it's nice to see a story like this telling it the way it is.