Dialing for Dollars

Public financing for election campaigns may not be a panacea, but it's got to be better than what we're doing now.

Public financing for election campaigns may not be a panacea, but it's got to be better than what we're doing now. (...) "I've never seen a search mechanism for any organization that's worse than that for the leadership of the United States of America," says Rauh, who came from the private sector.

His answer is a voluntary public-funding plan for federal elections. Full Story »

Posted by Beth Jones
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Extra
Topics: Presidential Election 2008, Campaign Reform, Money and Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Beth Jones - Oct 24, 2007 - 7:38 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Oct 24, 2007 - 8:10 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
2.4
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008

Doesn't fully, or cogently, explain how this public funding scheme would work on a national level. What makes Arizona different?

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Paul Kinzelman
3.8
by Paul Kinzelman - Oct. 1, 2008

Thank you for putting something positive about public financing, our only way out of the system of "legalized bribery" that we have now.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Beth Jones
4.0
by Beth Jones - Oct. 1, 2008

An interesting and informative summary of a promising organization – (full disclosure) which I've watched and supported for some time.

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
2.5
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece presents the author's viewpoint clearly, but it provides very little context and ignores all opinions that conflict with the author's. It does not even mention McCain-Feingold, which is a major cause of funding problems for political candidates. It also does not mention that the amount of money spent on political campaigns in the U.S. is remarkably small, probably less than $10 per resident of the U.S. for the coming election. While I give credit to the author for style, the other ratings have to be low due to the lack of coverage of the major factors involved in the issue.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
2.5
Fairness
3.8
Information
3.2
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Balance
1.5
Context
3.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
3.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!