Other dangerous mines? Federal data can't tell you

(Blog Post) ...he information is hidden behind a cumbersome search interface, one that's geared more to users who know the name of the mine or the company that operates it (Performance Coal Co.) rather than the owner (in this case, Massey Energy).

Also, none of the data can be downloaded in any format; the only way to get access to the raw data is to cut and paste it in a spreadsheet. Doing any kind of comparative analysis is impossible, because results are ... Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington

See All Reviews »

Review

Betsy Taylor
4.1
by Betsy Taylor - Apr. 12, 2010

This is a good, short article reviewing the web site for federal mine safety -- in terms of the accessiblity of the data. I hope other articles explore the context around this and the long term lack of transparency and access to key data about mining. This would be an excellent topic at this time. There are many problems that arise from the too close relationship between mining special interests and govt sectors. For instance, this article correctly refers to the lack of clarity or transparency re/ multiple owners. This is a long term problem -- see for instance the description & chart in Kai Erikson's book on the Buffalo Creek disaster. This article notes the difficulty in getting data to compare mines & patterns -- this also is chronic problem -- data systems & data access systems not set up so can assess & compare geographic extent of strip mining over time, environmental impacts, labor conditions, etc.

See All Reviews »

Betsy's Rating

Overall
4.1

Good
from 11 answers
Quality
3.9
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
2.0
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »