Are "national interest electric corridors" for us or for the industry?

Clayton's is the first national paper to provide coverage other than the AP account. He cites both the government's position and that of opponents and the possible results of the order. He fails to mention that the National Trust for Historic Presenrvation named historic places in transmission corridors as one of the 11 most endangered historic sites for 2007. And while he mentions the order's source of legislative authority, he fails to set it within the ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Mike LaBonte
3.4
by Mike LaBonte - Oct. 1, 2008

Plenty of links, sources, and evidence. I would like to see deeper digging into the context. What is the area's projected power demand growth rate, and will the system handle it without these corridors?

See All Reviews »

Mike's Rating

Overall
3.4

Average
from 10 answers
Quality
3.3
Facts
5.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
5.0
Style
3.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
More How our ratings work »