Are "national interest electric corridors" for us or for the industry?

The Writing Corner by Beth Wellington | Oct. 3, 2007 (Opinion)

Clayton's is the first national paper to provide coverage other than the AP account. He cites both the government's position and that of opponents and the possible results of the order. He fails to mention that the National Trust for Historic Presenrvation named historic places in transmission corridors as one of the 11 most endangered historic sites for 2007. And while he mentions the order's source of legislative authority, he fails to set it within the ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

View

Review

Kaizar Campwala
3.5
 by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008

This piece presents legislative information regarding the CS Monitor article about a Dept of Energy proposed energy corridor. She links to past efforts by energy companies to effect Federal policy. I needed to read the CS Monitor article to fully understand this piece. Neither this piece nor the CS Monitor piece give direct evidence that the Dept of Energy proposal is primarily beneficial to the Ohio Valley coal power companies. More research is needed.

Kaizar posted this story.

See All Reviews »

Kaizar's Rating

Overall
3.5

Average
from 12 answers
Quality
3.3
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
5.0
Style
3.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »