Why We'd Miss Musharraf

Pervez Musharraf is wobbling, and his political adversaries are moving in for the kill. But Pakistan's former leaders are hardly the democratic saviors they present themselves to be.

But observers can count on a couple of time-honored truths remaining true. Despite all the talk of elections and civilian rule, meaningful democracy will not emerge in Pakistan anytime soon, nor will the military abandon its grip on government. Pakistan's military possesses much greater staying power than most U.S. analysts assume, and it will remain the most potent and important political institution in the country for the foreseeable future. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Martha Rosler
2.8
by Martha Rosler - Oct. 1, 2008

A basic primer on the Washington establishment's point of view on Musharraf. Leaves out the US role in supporting the military dicator Zia Al Haq, esp. when it seemed India might be too friendly to the Soviet Union and also because of its proximity to Afghanistan, of course. Pakistan, the protectorate we can't live without but are not sure we can live with, esp. after the US seems to have gotten an earlier regime to offer safe haven to Bin Ladinites during the 80s war in Afghanistan in what we are now pleased to call the wild and wooly border regions of Waziristan.

See All Reviews »

Martha's Rating

Overall
2.8

Average
from 11 answers
Quality
2.8
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Style
5.0
Balance
2.0
Context
1.0
Popularity
2.5
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
2.0
More How our ratings work »