Where our defense money goes

The same week the Senate voted to cut funding for additional F-22s, for a savings of $1.75 billion, the Senate Armed Services Committee added another $9 billion in earmarks to the 2010 defense authorization bill. Earmarks direct money to a specific program or company in a member’s district for something that has not been requested by the Pentagon and has not been subject to any public review or hearing. It is a gift from a member to a constituent, a ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

See All Reviews »

Review

Dwight Rousu
4.2
by Dwight Rousu - Aug. 6, 2009

The article identifies congressional concealment of earmarks, and refusal to inform the public and refusal to rein in the abuse. Congressman Hodes' bill is presented as a move toward correcting the corruption. Well presented.

Publicly financed voter-owned elections would likely do more to halt this than the Hodes bill.

every dollar spent on the military is a dollar borrowed from the Chinese or Japanese governments, a dollar that must be repaid with interest.

The biggest portion of money doled out by the Senate Armed Services Committee was $4.3 million for “no member request’’ earmarks, a blatant move to circumvent rules requiring members of Congress to disclose the earmarks they have given out.

When the bill came to the House floor on July 30, Republican Congressmen Jeff Flake of Arizona and John Campbell of California offered amendments to strip 553 earmarks worth $2.7 billion from the bill. Their amendments were overwhelmingly defeated.

In April, Democratic congressman Paul Hodes of New Hampshire introduced legislation that would break the link between earmarks and campaign contributions. His bill would prohibit a member of Congress from taking a contribution from any person or company that has gotten an earmark from that member. It is very straightforward and it would go a long way toward ensuring that our defense policy is not driven by the defense industry’s spending on lobbying and campaign contributions. So far, Hodes has gotten only six Democrats and three Republicans to cosponsor his bill

See All Reviews »

Dwight's Rating

Overall
4.2

Good
from 17 answers
Quality
4.3
Information
4.0
Insight
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »