The Rage Is Not About Health Care

Demographics are avatars of a change bigger than any bill contemplated by President Obama or Congress — a change that can’t be repealed. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu - via Tim O'Reilly, Real Clear Politics, New York Times (Most Emailed), Digg, New York Times (Opinion), Memeorandum, Google News (U.S. Congress), NewsRack (Health Care), Opinion Source, David Wardell (t), Kristi Hancock (t), Jeremy Caplan (t), Josh_Young (t), Mark Pegrum (t), miker1717 (t), Malorie Jae Lucich (t), Donica Mensing (t), Rachel Fus (f), Fred Sampson (f), Alex Williams (f), Dave Palmer (f), Allan Foster (f), Jeremy Caplan (f), Tobie Openshaw (f), Margaret Yonco-Haines (f), Kaizar Campwala (f), David Fox (f), Matthew Nadler (f), Fabrice Florin (f), Jon Mitchell (f), Gian Antelles (f), Shams Kazi (f)
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Living, Health
Member Tags: tea party movement, reform and reorganization, law and legislation, united states politics and government, health insurance and managed care, john lewis, Barney Frank, emanuel cleaver, civil rights and liberties, threats and threatening messages, am update, health care reform
Stats Help
# Diggs: 1498 (as of 2010-03-29)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Mar 27, 2010 - 8:03 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Mar 28, 2010 - 11:11 PM PDT
Jack Dinkmeyer
4.6
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Mar. 29, 2010

This excellent, insightful opinion piece gives a new perspective about right-wing fringe and Teabagger rage; namely, to look, not at the rhetoric, but at its underlying causes: fears that certain groups fringies consider “unworthy” are taking over–along with strong doses of racism, homophobia; and nutcake religious beliefs. What’s scary is how easily the right-wing leadership uses fear mongering to stoke up fringies’ hysteria to a violence level.

The right wing justifies their irresponsibly fiery rhetoric as “freedom of speech.” But isn’t this really tantamount to shouting FIRE in a crowded theatre–which is not freedom of speech?

See Full Review » (16 answers)
Carlos R. Candelaria
4.8
by Carlos R. Candelaria - Apr. 2, 2010

Makes you wonder are they mad about the direction of our government, or the fact that they are not in power.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Mar. 28, 2010

Thoughtful, powerful, and extremely cautionary.

It is time for the riot wing and the inciting to riot wing to rein themselves in.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Samuel W.  Velsor IV
4.3
by Samuel W. Velsor IV - Apr. 5, 2010

Now if only those who know who they are would realize how badly they have and are acting.

See Full Review » (17 answers)

Comments on this story (1)Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.4

Good
from 8 reviews (54% confidence)
Quality
4.5
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.5
Information
3.7
Insight
4.7
Style
4.8
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
3.5
Context
4.6
Depth
4.5
Enterprise
4.5
Expertise
3.2
Originality
4.4
Relevance
4.8
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.8
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
4.8
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • The Tea Party: Populism of the privileged

    The Tea Party is nothing new. It represents a relatively small minority of Americans on the right end of politics, and it will not determine the outcome of the 2010 elections.
    Posted by Barry Grossheim