Sub-Standard

There was a time when neoconservatives sought to hold the moral and intellectual high ground. There was some- thing inspiring in their vision of America as a different kind of superpower--a liberal hegemon deploying its might on behalf of subjugated peoples, rather than mere self-interest. As the Iraq war has curdled, the idealism and liberalism have drained out of the neoconservative vision. What remains is a noxious residue of bullying militarism. ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Aug 22, 2007 - 9:09 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Polly Briley
4.1
by Polly Briley - Oct. 1, 2008

There is a huge difference between The New Republic and The National Review. One has reporters and opinion that believes facts shape opinion, the other has opinion that denies facts. The attacks by National Review have so brought down a formally thoughtful magazine. Now anyone could write their articles before the facts are even brought to light.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
John Primm
1.3
by John Primm - Oct. 1, 2008

Opinion it is... Methinks thou dost protest too much...as anyone will tell you, when you are in doubt of your position, attack the other.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.8

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
2.7
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Context
2.5
Popularity
2.9
Recommendation
2.8
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
2.6
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!