The Debates Are Killing Edwards and Obama

Obviously, debates benefit well-spoken, presentable candidates who can express themselves well in a minute or less -- one reason Mitt Romney and Hillary have done well so far. (Obama's tendency to generalize and philosophize is charming on the trail, not so much in a debate setting.)

Less obvious is the fact that exposure in these forums institutionalizes the leads of front-runners in the polls. That is one reason why, in this era of frequent ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Rory O'Connor
3.2
by Rory O'Connor - Oct. 1, 2008

Analyzes the current surfeit of presidential campaign debates, and concludes: "Conventional wisdom says that...debates help everyone but the front-runner in the polls, because they give the pack exposure and face time next to the leader. But so far in Campaign 2008, the opposite has been true. The constant debates are slowly destroying the candidacies of John Edwards and Barack Obama."

See All Reviews »

Rory's Rating

Overall
3.2

Average
from 7 answers
Quality
3.3
Fairness
3.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
2.5
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
2.0
More How our ratings work »