In Health Bill, Obama Attacks Wealth Inequality

For all the political and economic uncertainties about health reform, at least one thing seems clear: The bill that President Obama signed on Tuesday is the federal government’s biggest attack on economic inequality since inequality began rising more than three decades ago Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Peter Daou, NewsRack (Health Care), Slatest, Huffington Post (Health Care), Real Clear Politics, Memeorandum, New York Times (Most Emailed), NewsRack (Poverty), Ish Harshawat (t), Salvador Sala (t), miker1717 (t), Yuni Iwata (t), Kaizar Campwala (f), Fabrice Florin (f), Phylora Uppman (f), Patrick McDermott (f)

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Elizabeth White-Nadler
4.2
by Elizabeth White-Nadler - Mar. 24, 2010

While this should be considered an opinion piece rather than news analysis, it is extremely well thought out and Leonhardt's assertions are eloquently communicated. This perspective addresses the cultural and sociological implications of the health care bill and fits this into the larger picture of what Obama hopes to accomplish. The piece appears in the "Economic Scene," but the subject of it is actually much broader than that placement suggests.

I thought this was a marvelous piece of journalism. The discussion about the Reagan era and differences anticipated in the Obama era is enlightening, and shows how this sort of comparison can be done well--unlike the piece reviewed on NT a few days ago "Two Presidents, Two Recessions."

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Husein Q Campwala
4.2
by Husein Q Campwala - Mar. 24, 2010

Besides political wrangling and economic immpact being flung around-this is an extremely important treatment of Inequalities of hve & havenots.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Patricia L'Herrou
4.0
by Patricia L'Herrou - Mar. 25, 2010

while there are many facts and sources here, this does seem an opinion piece. the writer focuses on shifting wealth inequality on the 'poor' and little on the middle class, included within the 4x the poverty level, which has been pres. obama's often-stated goal.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Shawn Kerry Inlow
2.9
by Shawn Kerry Inlow - Mar. 28, 2010

It's almost an opinion piece. Leonhardt makes broad assertions without attribution outside the handy hot links in the story. The core analysis, though, is pretty interesting and has the ring of truth.

I like Leonhard's story more than my rating of it. Personally speaking, Reagan caused me to shift from independent to D. I did not like what Reagan represented and I think, if the writer is correct, Obama may be the antidote to a situation that has long needed balancing.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Sabrina Werby
4.9
by Sabrina Werby - Mar. 24, 2010

This story really uses the facts of the day to make a larger claim about the future direction of the policy and focus of our nation. This story also uses historical context in order to better understand current Health Care reform and the larger reasons behind it.

This is a great article! I learned a lot!

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.2
by Kaizar Campwala - Mar. 24, 2010
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Vernon Huffman
1.9
by Vernon Huffman - Mar. 25, 2010

The Health Reform bill requires Americans to buy health insurance, an expensive product from an industry that produces nothing of any value. This cannot be disguised as progressive reform. This debate began with the vast majority of Americans demanding Single Payer Universal Health Care. This was immediately watered down to the Public Option, and then even that compromise was abandoned. Every sentence of the Senate bill was written by industry hacks. No progress here.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Richard Sawey
2.0
by Richard Sawey - Mar. 24, 2010

It's very vague, the central premise would fit in a tweet, and doesn't need the space allocated. So lightweight in fact that the 'Is it fair?" question above isn't really applicable.

See Full Review » (3 answers)

Comments on this story (1)Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 15 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
3.9
Fairness
3.7
Sourcing
3.7
Style
4.0
Context
5.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
4.5
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
3.9
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
4.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!