Unpopular Science

We live in a time of pathbreaking advances in biotechnology and nanotechnology, of private spaceflight and personalized medicine, amid a climate and energy crisis, in a world made more dangerous by biological and nuclear terror threats and global pandemics. Meanwhile, advances in neuroscience are calling into question who we are, whether our identities and thought processes can be reduced to purely physical phenomena, whether we actually have free will. ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Dwight Rousu
4.2
by Dwight Rousu - Aug. 4, 2009

Mooney and Kirshenbaum look at a subject that is important. Corporate media cuts science reporting to save costs. Science on the internet is flaky and not peer reviewed. Journalists are so technically ignorant that they try to cover themselves by presenting "balanced" science versus nonsense. Mooney and Kirshenbaum advocate training scientists to communicate, but that requires a medium and an audience that understands.

Our planet faces major science oriented problems and opportunities. 95% of politicians are scientifically challenged, and that is an improvement upon the general population. The public must be informed enough to vote on science in a democracy, or at least vote for representative delegates who are informed on science. Else we will be led again by anti-science fakirs. (And pull out those Scientific American issues, and submit stories on NewsTrust!)

See All Reviews »

Dwight's Rating

Overall
4.2

Good
from 13 answers
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
5.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »