Science and the Islamic world--The quest for rapprochement

Internal causes led to the decline of Islam's scientific greatness long before the era of mercantile imperialism. To contribute once again, Muslims must be introspective and ask what went wrong.

he question I want to pose--perhaps as much to myself as to anyone else--is this: With well over a billion Muslims and extensive material resources, why is the Islamic world disengaged from science and the process of creating new knowledge? To be definite, I am here using the 57 countries of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) as a proxy for the Islamic world. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Sci/Tech, Religion
Member Tags: science & technology in Islam countries
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Aug 3, 2007 - 4:57 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Jun 19, 2008 - 2:54 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Patricia L'Herrou
3.9
by Patricia L'Herrou - Oct. 1, 2008

this is an important and fascinating piece. important because the elements regarding fundamentalism in Islam and science and cultural and educational attitudes toward the scientific method which he discusses may clearly be projected to our modern society. A scientist himself, the author points out historical yet focuses on present-day factors including the impact of Western intervention, to understand the dearth of scientific achievements in Muslim countries.

See Full Review » (9 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.4
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Linda Raiteri
3.6
by Linda Raiteri - Oct. 1, 2008

addresses the question of what happened to the genius of the Islamic world over the last 1000 years and concludes that pedantry has superseded critical thinking (plus the requirement to stop everything and pray five times a day). Cites statistics on percentage of women in university, scientic papers published in Islamic world, etc. by chair of dept of physics in Pakistan. presentation is academic rather than journalistic

See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.3
Sourcing
3.7
Style
3.5
Balance
2.0
Context
4.3
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.8
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!