U.S. rule is hurting HIV fight

A new study suggests the United States is hurting the fight against the human immunodeficiency virus with its anti-prostitution rule.

In order to receive U.S. funding for HIV prevention or control projects, recipient organizations must take a pledge that explicitly condemns prostitution. However, researchers have determined such condemnation is not effective at helping to control the global HIV epidemic.

Nicole Franck Masenior and Chris ... Full Story »

Posted by Dale Penn
Tags Help
Subjects: Health
Topics: HIV/AIDS
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dale Penn - Jul 24, 2007 - 3:32 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dale Penn - Jul 24, 2007 - 3:34 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
2.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008

This is not responsible journalism. No space is given to a response from the Administration, let alone other parties that may have a different perspective on the issue. The reader is not presented with or explanation justification of the anti-prostitution rule.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Dale Penn
3.0
by Dale Penn - Oct. 1, 2008

[see link to full PLoS Journal article below]

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Lynn Schlossberger
3.0
by Lynn Schlossberger - Oct. 1, 2008

The article raises an important topic but is too cursory to be useful. It fails to identify sources of "US funding" for HIV prevention that require condemning of prostitution by grant recipients. Therefore the claim is hard to verify. Is there a further requirement that commercial sex workers be denied outreach services for HIV prevention? After all, one could both condemn and provide condoms.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.9

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
2.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
2.5
Information
3.0
Sourcing
2.5
Style
2.0
Balance
1.0
Context
3.5
Popularity
2.8
Recommendation
2.8
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics