How to Get Fewer Scientists

President Bush told cancer researchers gathered at the National Institutes of Health in January that we need to "make sure that our scientists are given the tools and encourage young kids to become scientists in the first place." Yet his administration's stingy NIH budgets over the past five years and its threat last week to veto the appropriations bill giving the NIH a small funding boost sound more like components of a Discourage Future Scientists Act. Full Story »

Posted by Melva Hackney

See All Reviews »

Review

Carol Jacobs-Carre
4.4
by Carol Jacobs-Carre - Oct. 1, 2008

Very few people realize that most original scientific research is actually done at universities, and then acquired by private companies when the post docs go to work for them. A lot of professors also start up small research firms funded by these government grants, and then sell the patent rights to big firms, such as pharmaceuticals. The universities get a cut of the action, but it is usually a one shot disbursement. The private firms cough up the money for the patenting. Most research done at pharmaceuticals goes to figuring out how to recycle a drug with an expiring patent (look to Prilosec which became Nexium!) with a so called "novel" use for a new patent (say, from ulcers to GERD). A lot more money is spent on advertising in private firms, something universities and university researchers don't have the moeny for, so their work is largely unrecognized.

See All Reviews »

Carol's Rating

Overall
4.4

Good
from 13 answers
Quality
4.5
Facts
3.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
5.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »