In Attacking NY Times O'Reilly Deceives Newspapers Who Carry His Syndicated Column

Huffington Post by Steve Young | Jul. 22, 2007 (Opinion)

What Bill failed to mention, was that the Times writers, Mark Mazzetti and David Sanger, reported what the NIE report said, which was also the consensus of all 16 branches of the U.S. Intelligence community. Without that small omission, Bill would have had to say that there was a division between President Bush and intelligence. Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: Business, Media
Topics: Mainstream Media
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Jul 22, 2007 - 8:54 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Leo Romero (review), Fabrice Florin (review), Jim Lang (review), Ronald Riel (review), Carlos R. Candelaria (review), Ferd Macaluso (review), Gerry Allen (review), Jim Mac Donald (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - Jul 22, 2007 - 8:55 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jim Lang
3.8
 by Jim Lang - Oct. 1, 2008

A blog post using quotes to attack Bill O'Reilly for his lack for journalistic integrity. It's entertaining and news to me because I studiously avoid O'Reilly and those of his ilk across the political spectrum.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Jim Mac Donald
1.0
 by Jim Mac Donald - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Leo Romero
3.0
 by Leo Romero - Oct. 1, 2008
Leo posted this story.
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Carlos R. Candelaria
5.0
 by Carlos R. Candelaria - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Fabrice Florin
3.0
 by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Ronald Riel
5.0
 by Ronald Riel - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Gerry Allen
4.0
 by Gerry Allen - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Ferd Macaluso
NO RATING
by Ferd Macaluso - Jul. 22, 2007
See Full Review » (0 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.5
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.5
Information
4.5
Sourcing
4.5
Style
4.0
Balance
2.0
Context
4.5
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
2.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!