This news article does a good job of bringing social capital. It provides social capital because it shows a group of Florida residents with the same views ("63%...rated immigration as an "important" or "very important" factor" and "Fully 41 percent of Florida voters said they "strongly support" implementation of state-based policies designed to discourage illegal immigration."). It also promotes social capital because it encourages Florida residents to vote in upcoming elections, as ... More »
Alia Beard Rau has written a very relevant piece on the Arizona immigration law, however, it lacks context due to repeating the law and its policies rather than providing new facts. Rau generally speaks to people of all characteristics in this piece, male/female, adults (18+, but possibly teens as well), all social classes and regions, however, this article is more geared towards Hispanics.
Frank Sherry backs his claims up by obviously doing his research on Whitman, going back to her claims last year in October 2009, along with giving poll statistics and statements. The fault lines that Sherry includes in this piece are females (Whitman and Ms. Diaz), Hispanics, rich people, and geared towards voters 18+.
The frame of this news article proves to be more structural. The news piece is more structural, due to the fact that it is stating facts about the impact that illegal immigration has had on the governor race, the candidates, and overall the state. It also cited many sources, including an immigrant, thrift store worker, and former state Republican chairman to bring diversity to the article. This frame was appropriate because it was factual and straightforward.
I believe the frame used in this news article is institutional, due to the fact that the writer is offering and sharing what she feels Washington's behavior needs to be in the case of illegal immigration. I feel the frame is appropriate, however, in order to make this more of a personal opinion piece, the writer should have backed their claims up better.
This not very good journalism; it seems the author is biased in the sense that he/she is against illegal immigrants. Rather than getting a variety of opinions, the author chose statements and comments that were against the Brazilian illegal immigrant, thus it was not fair, balanced, and was poorly sourced. They also did not provide any more examples about illegal immigration in Martha's Vineyard. Although the author was biased and did not provide many examples, they provided facts about the car accident rather than defending Brandy Gibson.
The article did explain complexities of the issue, such as how the conflict started and the details of the deal that Ms. Castro made with the border patrol, as well as shedding light on the father’s past of being a witness to a murder. The article failed to offer a depth of understanding to the issue, such as how this is critical for other immigration cases and did not go in depth to the possible reason Rosa was taken. The article raised questions for me, rather than clarifying, because it was unclear about the status of the case and why Rosa was taken. This article will impact the public dialogue about the issue because it puts the border patrol into question and will raise questions about how they’ve been handling similar ... More »
The article explained complexities to the issues, specifically when the reporter shared other cases such as the mother who had a past with heroin, and stated that the Grand Rapids school system may revisit the policy and be sensitive to Cross’ situation but is “wary to make too many exceptions”. The article also offered a depth of understanding to the issue by offering a variety of sources, ranging from scholars to other moms in the community that give one an idea of what type of person Cross is, and if it is reasonable to let other people with a criminal past be allowed to volunteer with children. The article clarified the question I had, which was how other mothers felt about Cross and her desire to volunteer, but I ... More »





This opinion piece from SF Gate by Michael Honda and Scott does promote social capital because the subject of community and the word "we" pop up frequently. Both authors emphasis the importance of having racial communities throughout America, whether it be Asian communities or Latin communities. Also, the last two lines of the article are promoting social capital by wanting uniting America: "It's time to reunite America. No family excluded".