This article is not very good journalism. It is not in-depth at all and does not have much supporting information. There are not many expert quotes. I would not recommend this article if you are interested in this topic.
This is good journalism because it is important for people to see some of the things that really do go on in the world. It is tragic that this did happen though. The article is well-written, and it has a lot of supporting details.
The journalism of this story is okay. It is relevant information, and most of the information is true, but some opinionated. There are not many experts quoted in the article, but overall it is a good story.
This is good journalism because it is a relevant topic and it gives good information. It is well sourced and seems professional in the writing.
I think this is very good journalism because it is very informative, factual, and well-sourced. It provides many quotes from people and relevent information on the topic.
I don't think this is good journalism because it lacks a lot of the qualities needed for a good story. It has no sources, and it is not factual because the information is not cited. It is relevent though, because more people are riding bikes now for various reasons.
The story is relevant because their are many things going on in the world today with the middle east/Egypt. No one had to go through anything difficult to get information for this story, and there is not enough background information for someone who does not know what is going on today, so it may be irrelevant for some people.
I think this is good journalism because it is well written, relevent because it relates to the current economy, and it is informative for both men and women. It is thoroughly researched because it displays good detail that relates to the topic.
This is not good journalism because it does not seem fully researched or cited. It also seems to be opinionated.
