Such a tragic event that this article explains in a very in depth manor. It is very factual which contributes to the powerful message of this awful occurrence. No one should be treated this way.

While this article has stated that by reading it, "the rumors can now be put to rest", I disagree. With not direct quotes, especially from the most reliable source this article could have quoted, Mfume himself, it leaves the reader skeptical. By providing a quote from Mfume, it would have given the article more credability and provide the readers with an explanation as to why he allegedly will not be running. While the writer seemingly attempts to provide the readers with explanations hinting to why he did not run, such as his prior allegations, that is not sufficient enough. All in all, this article is mediocre and seemingly not credible.

This is a very attention-seeking story which more officials should take a look at. With the many facts, quotes, statistics, and sense of urgency in the article, the reader may have the desire to take action on this issue immediately. While it is seemingly biased, it is not a surprise to where the people at fault stand.

There really is not much to this article. Also, sources of the statistics that are listed could be more specific to build better credibility. It is not very risk taking or filled with initiative, as well.

This is a great story proving that in order to succeed you need hard work, determination, and a bit of luck. Even after writing so many books Helldorfer kept writing because she loved to. The only issue I have with the article is the that the second paragraph, with the quoted conversation, is a tad "messy" and unclear; could have been written better in my opinion. Other than that this was an informative article.

This is a very well written story that is also truly unfortunate to read about. From the numerous sourced facts the article provides, the reader can feel more connected to the troubles by understanding exactly what is going on. Also, there are no grammatical errors and it is all comprehensible.

This is the type of journalism that people can rely on. With numerous sites, it proves to be reliable by quoting credable doctors and psychologists. Also, by referring to research by the JHU Institue of Medicine, it gives a good perspective of the reality of the situation at hand with the shocking statistics. Only negative is it could be viewed as biased from the view of one who does not support gay rights, for example.

I this is is a great story that is backed by factual and credible information. It is a relavent issue that people are talking about. Very well written as well, with clear understanding throughout the piece.

It is pretty good journalism with some hiccups throughout. For example, there are numerous run-on sentences which can be confusing at times. Also, a more concrete, credible source should be cited. Though it refers back to the Board numerous times, are there other concrete sources for the cases? Overall, however, it is very detailed with great examples filled with versatile opinions.

Seems a little scattered as it focuses on three separate issues. However, it is still a good piece.