This was not very good journalism at all because In the article the author didn't really talk about Obama much at all. It seemed like he used Obamas name just tog et people to read it but mostly the story was just about islanders outrage over the immigrants. Plus the author didn't cite his sources well at all throughout the article.

This is not very good journalism by the author because he/she has to go more into detail over the whole race for mayor. Also the story was not very newsworthy because it didn't show that much novelty and was not much of a human interest. It's not something a reader will want to stop what they are doing and read this article

Mr. Mooks article showed pretty good journalism because he was talking about things that are new and informative to the readers. He also does a good job in explaining how the stocks went down but somehow the revenue for the company went up. overall this article used pretty good journalism.

I think the author Mr. Byrne showed good journalism by adding his experiences with bike riding to further support his opinion towards more bicycle riding in the city. He also used the recent accident near John Hopkins university brilliantly to support the courts ruling to make drivers pay more than a ticket for hitting bicyclist while driving. Overall Mr. Byrnes showed good journalism throughout this article

In this article Marta explained and got her point across clearly on why high schools need to focus more on preparing kids for college and life. In the article I was amazing by the one fact she used. The average age of a student at the two schools she visited was 27 years old and how most were taking classes on sentences and adding/subtracting. Overall this showed good journalism and helped me learn things I didn't before.

This is good journalism because the author gets right to the point of what the author is trying to get across to it's readers. Also they use very good supporting quotes to show and illustrate why being the grand marshall is such a cool thing with the 180mph tour and saying the famous "start your engines".

This article by Mr. Lazarick was written very well and showed that he was very enthusiastic about the wind mills as well. In the article he used many outstanding quotes that battled all different sides of the situation. The quotes are so good because they are not just pushed in to the article to fill up space, they were placed throughout the article in a well thought of process. Overall i thought this was a very good article.

I think this is pretty good journalism because i like the way the author uses the quotes from the parents and doctors. I just think that the author could have gone a little more in depth into the story and made it more exciting. Overall i thought it was a good article and got the general point across to its readers.

Yes i think this is good journalism because the author states both sides of the story. The author gives a whole section for both why the bill should be passed and it should not be. The author uses the sources very well throughout the article to help you get get a non biased opinion on the subject.

This is pretty good journalism but not great journalism because this article is not very interesting to me. I would not talk to my friends or recommend this article to a person because he doesn't add that much details. The author should have added more details about where they were working and their ages. Overall its a ok article.

This is very good journalism because he made it very easy to read and too realize their cultures. The way he wrote this was very good and articles about personal experiences alwasy offer more insightfulness to their peice.

This is pretty good journalism because they use a lot of very good facts to support the main idea. Mr. Mook sourced his information very well too. Overall a pretty good article