Peter McManus

Founding Member (since June 2008)
Help

About Peter Help
Last Visit: Oct 1, 2008 - 5:37 PM PDT
Last Edit: Jun 17, 2008 - 12:12 PM PDT

This profile can be seen by everyone, including search engines. Help
| Network |

Activity

Show all | Reviews | Posts | Starred | Comments
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
4.2

This frightening exchange reveals how poorly McCain has actually "controlled" his temper. It shows a petty and juvenile streak that would be frightening in a president. It's too intellectual for an attack ad, but pass it around on college campuses.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
NT Rating: 3.0 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
4.0

Accurate info about a recent poll. Nothing outstanding, nothing bad.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
NT Rating: 3.0 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
3.9

Good intro to Gov. Jindal, if you don't know him (as I didn't).

See Full Review » (13 answers)
NT Rating: 2.9 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
3.1

Extensive, but hostile, analysis of McCain's past and present positions. Emphasis on changes in these positions, with strong suggestions that McCain is pandering to important voter groups. Maybe true, but very one-sided.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 4.2 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
2.5

Good start for a really good article - maybe catching West Point authorities favoring pro-war groups. But so far just "maybe". Finish the research, please, and we'll all applaud!

See Full Review » (12 answers)
NT Rating: 3.0 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
3.6

All about Obama, McCain hardly mentioned. Seemed fair enough.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
NT Rating: 3.6 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
3.6

Brief bio, CV and favorite talking points of both candidates. Nothing very new, but even-handedly impertinent to both men . The author's best insight is that the American media gives McCain a pass for factual gaffes.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
NT Rating: 3.2 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
2.7

The author accuses the media of blindly accepting McCain's talking points. Maybe. Maybe they just disagree with the author? The basic idea, "let's see if we believe McCain is good in town hall gatherings", was good.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
NT Rating: 3.3 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
1.2

This is good entertainment, if you're liberal and enjoy taking shots at McCain. It's not journalism.

See Full Review » (3 answers)
NT Rating: 3.0 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
4.4

Wow! This PolitiFact.com site is a real find. It's in the spirit of Factcheck.org, but this one is much more fun to read. Read "The McCain File" and all the other "File"s they have.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
NT Rating: 4.2 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
3.4

Not much here on McCain. For balance, the article needed maybe one sentence from McCain or a surrogate, summarizing the case against talking to "enemy" leaders. The article and the poll it reports on both assumed too easily that talking with Iran meant talking with Ahmedinijad.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
NT Rating: 3.8 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
3.1

A reasonably complete rundown of what was new at the time the article was published. Too much unsourced gossip, though. Nothing covered in depth.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
NT Rating: 2.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
3.0

Just a filler piece about campaign spending, quoting info from Campaign Media Analysis Group, and one of CMAG's people. Seems fair and accurate, but it's a yawner.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
NT Rating: 3.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
1.6

A strained argument to conclude that the woman equates America to God, then strained deductions from that conclusion. This is at the level of a nasty blogger. Ok, better spelling.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
NT Rating: 3.4 | See All NT Reviews »
Peter reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Peter's Rating
2.4

It's a transcript of a McCain speech. No commentary, no spin. I'd have preferred to see it side-by-side with an Obama speech, but it's accurate and informative for what it is.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
NT Rating: 2.9 | See All NT Reviews »
(Beta)

Levels & Stats

Member LevelHelp
2.3 avg.
2.3 avg.
Activity
3.1 avg.
Experience
1.0 avg.
Ratings
1.0 avg.
Transparency
1.0 avg.
Validation
3.0 avg.

StatsHelp
Reviews
15
Answers
157
Comments
0
Ratings Received
0
Number of Raters
0
Ratings Given
0

Member Ratings

Ratings received by Peter Help

No ratings received yet.


Ratings given by Peter Help

No ratings given yet.

Peter's Widget

Add this widget to your site »