Patricia W. Neal

Member (since February 2009)
Help

About Patricia Help
Last Visit: Oct 26, 2011 - 1:57 PM PDT
Last Edit: Jun 21, 2009 - 8:42 PM PDT

This profile can be seen by everyone, including search engines. Help
| Network |

Activity

Show all | Reviews | Posts | Starred | Comments
Patricia reviewed this story - Feb 26, 2011
Patricia's Rating
2.0

We can split hairs regarding Social Security contributing to the deficit or we can take an unsplit hair and go back to the original legislation which says Social Security will be a self supporting Act. Funded by the withholding of contributions from employees and employers. Secondarily, the surplus funds are invested in Treasury Bills which is where the Federal Government taps into those surplus funds or borrows them. Now , if this adds to the deficit, that is not due to the Social Security Fund being short. Social Security in its many revisions still has assets to pay out to retirees until 2037. Granted there are problems ahead that need to be addressed quickly, but not by demonizing Social Security in stating it ... More »

See Full Review » (2 answers)
NT Rating: 2.8 | See All NT Reviews »
Patricia reviewed this story - Feb 7, 2011
Patricia's Rating
4.0

I'm not sure I would call it good journalism, it is good opinion. Professor Krugman is a good analyst, I would have preferred more detail on the role that speculators and government policies play in commodity pricing. One example: the artificial price increases to corn, due to US Government subsidies to agriculture and specifically monopolies such as ADM.

See Full Review » (3 answers)
NT Rating: 3.9 | See All NT Reviews »
(Beta)

Levels & Stats

Member LevelHelp
1.7 avg.
1.7 avg.
Activity
1.0 avg.
Experience
1.0 avg.
Ratings
2.5 avg.
Transparency
1.0 avg.
Validation
2.0 avg.

StatsHelp
Reviews
2
Answers
3
Comments
0
Ratings Received
2
Number of Raters
2
Ratings Given
0

Member Ratings

Ratings received by Patricia (2) Help



Ratings given by Patricia Help

No ratings given yet.

Patricia's Widget