This is quality journalism because it brings in statistics from every sub part of the overall topic. It doesn't just state what happened and repeat itself in 8 different ways (like most articles do) it also brings in statistics from different years other than this year.
This is quality journalism because of the way the coverage of the story continues even after the overall point of it has been covered.
I think this is "C" type journalism. Although most of the facts are here in this article, the way it is presented seems sort of lazy. The spacing between certain quotes and actions seem unnecessary and seems as if they shouldn't be in the article at all.
This is quality journalism. Although it seemed like a textbook passage, it got the point across in an effective fashion and stuck straight to the facts with no inferences or editorial opinion.
I think this article was an interesting look on terrorism from two years ago compared to terrorism now. Back then anyone who had nuclear weapons could potentially have some terrorists hiding out in there.