Martin Kearns

Founding Member (since April 2006)
Help

More Info

About Martin Help
Last Visit: Oct 5, 2006 - 6:35 PM PDT
Last Edit: Oct 5, 2006 - 6:34 PM PDT

This profile can be seen by everyone, including search engines. Help
| Network |

Activity

Show all | Reviews | Posts | Starred | Comments
Martin reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Martin's Rating
5.0
See Full Review » (1 answer)
NT Rating: 4.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Martin reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Martin's Rating
4.2

solid story. not very easy to read. not human or emotionally engaging.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
NT Rating: 4.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Martin reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Martin's Rating
2.8
See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 3.6 | See All NT Reviews »
Martin reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Martin's Rating
1.8

The story creates confussion and is not clear in logic (why does the opinion of the Vatican matter on science?). It is not clear the Vatican paper speaks for the Pope (picture) or represents church doctrine. Messy science, poor theology, and bad reporting.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 2.8 | See All NT Reviews »
See all 4 reviews Help
Get Widget | RSS Member RSS Feed
(Beta)

Levels & Stats

Member LevelHelp
3.0 avg.
3.0 avg.
Activity
1.0 avg.
Experience
1.0 avg.
Ratings
1.0 avg.
Transparency
1.0 avg.
Validation
5.0 avg.

StatsHelp
Reviews
4
Answers
18
Comments
0
Ratings Received
0
Number of Raters
0
Ratings Given
0

Member Ratings

Ratings received by Martin Help

No ratings received yet.

Ratings given by Martin Help

No ratings given yet.

Martin's Widget

See this member's widget »