This is really a strange story not supported by any pertinent information. I am wondering why this is a story in fact.

Excellent story that brings around some key points that we aren't used to seeing about the absolute failure of the Conservative Movement

Great article right on the money and coming from a perspective that isn't often considered

Good article it made me think. The get richer but not if we keep our eye on the ball so to speak. Tax the rich is where we need to be that would be the most fair especially when they have taken such unfair advantage of us all over all these years.

A good news story that is cutting edge and the kind of thing we need to know about.

Good story all the way around showing the complexities of the region.

This is a choice piece of writing very well done and illustrating the hypocrisy of Richard Cohen.

While the reporting is good the presentation is all over the place. I think it could be tighter in terms of tying things together. The facts are chilling in themselves but we need more of a starting point or a reference channel to make heads or tails of what he is saying...

I understand the story and agree with its premise but we need to go a further in understanding these crimes against humanity and the American Justice system. We come out on the opinion side a bit too much but I think in the end it does what it set out to do which is to shine a light on the corruption of our government vis a vis the Bush Adminstrations use of torture.

This lays it out perfectly. Now I understand more of what is going on and this should be the purpose of the news to reveal and educate. A clear presentation of the facts.

Solid, informative, based on facts that haven't been highlighted. This is something to think about for sure. Obama's ties to Corn instead of Sugar Cane make sense for American business however in this case the best bet is the Sugar Cane. Very good article

This is a great story blasting the MSM to its advertising core. The only thing they left out was that the MSM no longer is just the facts M'am but more what facts shall we make up so that we can fill all those countless hours. It must be hell to work on these shows.

I didn't get much from this story. I mean yes it is wrong to slur Michele Obama but we would need more information about the background for this slur. It informs but loses my interest. If this is a big deal then out with it. If not, why bother.

This states the facts. There is nothing else it needed to do. The story speaks for itself.

This sounds more like a made up story since the journalist has a book to plug. While I agree that the fairness doctrine may be a good thing to ressurect I think that we really don't get more than innuendo in this article and speculation. More meat would have been better.

This is a great story well researched with lots of examples. This really gives the big picture. It describes something that cannot be overly iterated which is the John McCain is in bed with these oil companies ala George Bush and Company and that we will only have more of the same should he get elected.

I am a big Olberman fan so I definitely liked this story. It features the comic voices of Olberman and points out the irony in the news. Go Keith

This turns out to be a half hearted attempt to brand Olberman as something less than what? What is the point here? Is this about Olberman or about the news itself. The fact that the news is evolving is a no brainer and something that has its own evolutionary course. Howard Rosenberg is all over the place with this article except for making a coherent point. Olberman does a great job at what he does. Don't expect him to submit to some kind of artificial standard for newsmakers. It just won't happen.

This is a short blip of a story so it is hard to tell everything behind it. It would have been good to talk about what really is wrong with the economy, the oil prices and Republicans cashing out but then that is another story.

This is incredible that we have such a paramilitary force operating within our borders. The story is excellent in that it gives numerous examples, details and shows what is happening going forward. The problem with this story is that it probably won't play in a lot of markets due to its length and because there is a tendency to bury these kinds of stories because they really are scary.

I like this story because it shows the pattern that McCain will say anything to win voters. McCain is becoming blatant about it so much so that any substance he used to have is gone by the wayside. This makes it clear how transparent he has become.

We're getting the extension of McCain's biggest problem his flip flopping.

It does not tell us anything. Hello what is going on where is juice?

Well just because this is Karl Rove I listened to his theories but you know what he must be wearing blinders to the enthusiasm of Obamas campaign. Obama's organization registered millions of new voters who will likely turn out in the general election. Mr Rove does not mention this at all. You have to believe that Rove is spinning here to the max. He makes good points but as usual only tells part of the story.

This was definitely something that I just found out about so I did have interest in the story. That is the thing about these news stories. Either they catch you before you hear them or after. If afterwards you are getting something predigested but this one was just the facts of the story.

This is not a good story or analysis. In fact it is so full of holes and wishful thinking that one wonders whether the journalist wrote this in spurts kind of thinking one thing and writing another. The idea that Bush will be remembered as anything other than a failure is preposterous to even suggest.

I think this is a really basic article with just the facts but what is missing is any kind of analysis that hasn't already been has through. As a straight News story yeah its okay but very boring

She shows some of the differences but these based on certain assumptions that fall by the wayside when you consider the big picture. Why this is a story kind of puzzles me. Her point is that there are differences and yet she never touches the issues. How odd?

This story reads like a play with a beginning or end. The middle is kind of there but I wonder why bother with rehashing the obvious. Where are the facts and what is the real issue. This really goes no where

it makes sense even though the subject matter is obscure. The top money affects everything under it was what I got from this story.