Marie_class_medium

Marie Moore

Member (since March 2011)
Help

About Marie Help
Last Visit: Jan 13, 2013 - 10:16 AM PST
Last Edit: Jan 13, 2013 - 10:16 AM PST

This profile can be seen by everyone, including search engines. Help
| Network |

Activity

Show all | Reviews | Posts | Starred | Comments
Marie reviewed this story - Apr 23, 2011
Marie's Rating
4.0

This is GREAT journalism, it is factual and current. I'm impressed with the story it was very well-written and in-depth. I learned a lot that I didn't know about my school meaning there was plenty of facts and quotes.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.9 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Apr 23, 2011
Marie's Rating
3.8

It's decent journalism, just boring though. It's a great program though and interesting. it just needs to present the facts better.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.4 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Apr 23, 2011
Marie's Rating
3.1

The sources were correct. It was short and to the point. It just stated that he would not be running. It's good journalism because it's relevant to us because it is about local news.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 2.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Apr 17, 2011
Marie's Rating
3.9

I thought it was good journalism due to the fact that it was all facts. There was no opinion. It gave statistics and that's what most people want to know and the effects of the tornado.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.6 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Apr 8, 2011
Marie's Rating
3.7

There is a lot of proof and information about the bats and the disease. It goes into full detail on where, what, when, where, why, and how.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.7 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Apr 5, 2011
Marie's Rating
3.7

It is good journalism because it's a topic were all concerned about right now and it gives different people's opinions and views and facts.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.7 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Mar 28, 2011
Marie's Rating
3.1

I think this topic is something that all Americans are concerned about greatly especially people who eat things imported from there especially sushi as it was seen on the news as a concern. However the story was insightful and factual on that account about comparing the low radiation freakout to a flight on an airplane.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.1 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Mar 16, 2011
Marie's Rating
2.7

The story is good and full of statistics however there's no validity to the stats. It however does state the Maryland law about not being able to pass when the lights are flashing and the stop arm is out. It's decent journalism.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
NT Rating: 3.2 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Mar 16, 2011
Marie's Rating
4.0

It's really informative above the nuclear power plant situation. It gives different views too, it references to other countries that could be affected other than just Japan and how the U.S. is trying to help. It gave good description on the power plant and what is going on.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
NT Rating: 4.0 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Mar 13, 2011
Marie's Rating
3.3

Although it is factual. I don't think it's good journalism just to have tons of pictures and no article to capture statistics and a covering of this huge crisis. Sometimes pictures are better than words but a caption doesn't full the void of words.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
NT Rating: 4.0 | See All NT Reviews »
Marie reviewed this story - Mar 13, 2011
Marie's Rating
2.7

I think the story does show great specific examples of why illegal immigrants are a very serious issue affecting U.S citizens. I don't believe this is a good source of journalism. I feel like they didn't tie in Obama to Martha's Vineyeard. Illegal immigrants didn't seem to fit in.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
NT Rating: 2.3 | See All NT Reviews »
Certified_student_reviewer
(Beta)

Levels & Stats

Member LevelHelp
2.1 avg.
2.1 avg.
Activity
2.5 avg.
Experience
1.0 avg.
Ratings
3.5 avg.
Transparency
1.3 avg.
Validation
2.0 avg.

StatsHelp
Reviews
11
Answers
82
Comments
0
Ratings Received
2
Number of Raters
1
Ratings Given
0

Member Ratings

Ratings received by Marie (2) Help



Ratings given by Marie Help

No ratings given yet.