This story was very factual and well-written, but it left a lot of questions unanswered. It assumes a given level of knowledge and doesn't go too in depth on the issue. What is the upfront cost and what do the energy companies think of this? Any opposition?

This was a clear and interesting article about antibiotics being used in livestock and the kinds of effects it can have. The reporter was able to synthesize the most important and relevant information and put it into the article.

This was a great overview of investment in green technology. It was nothing too in-depth, but it gave easy-to-understand facts and the research was very organized. It was a little "dry," but that's to be expected of a financial piece.

This story left me with a feeling of "wait, what?" It was difficult to follow and I think it could have done a better job giving background and explaining why C.C.S. is important. It talked more about the scientific and geological side rather than overall environmental or social impact.

This article was extremely informative. It made this somewhat complicated topic easy to understand and intriguing. The article also provided background and an in-depth look at the issue. I found it to be very compelling.

This article was very informative and gave a lot of facts, but did not include any in-depth analysis on the topic. It didn't give much background on the topic either. If you were looking for an article to give you the quick, current facts, this would be it. But if you wanted a big picture, all-around look at the protests in Libya, look elsewhere.