While many different stakeholders are interviewed for this article, their opinions only are featured primarily. More factual, neutral stats are needed to contextualize the experts' takes. I'm still left wondering about hydraulic fracturing; it's a relatively new technology and there seems to be many conflicting opinions on its long-term safety and efficiency.

Clearly expressed, pithy, and thought-provoking. Written with authority. Original way to wrap up 2011 and look toward the future.

Seems odd that the writer has trouble with mainstream media following key tenets of journalism, including accurately reporting facts and contextualizing statements made by public figures. If media outlets should not do this, what is their purpose? He seems content with having public figures, particularly conservative ones, say their pieces and let them stand without challenge, even when they are not true and need context in order to understand them better.

Well-written and authoritative opinion piece. Many links to varied supporting sources lend it credibility and provide avenues for learning more.

Interactive calculator is useful in figuring out what percent users are. Needs more context: How many people are in the various percentages? Breakdowns by geographic region, education level, race and ethnicity? I'm not sure if this information is available, but if so, it would help make this picture more clear.

This article details another ethics scandal for News Corp., this time involving a circulation-fixing deal with European versions of the Wall Street Journal. This story is relevant, particularly after recent revelations of the News of the World phone hacking scandal's extent.

Includes key quotations from experts in international law that help explain the legal consequences of this alleged plot. Clearly written. Though not very in-depth, the article still successfully shows why this event is newsworthy and relevant.