Entirely one-sided, and thin on evidence, but given that this is the WSJ, the arguments presented here are likely to carry some weight in select conservative circles.

A carefully written criticism of the NLRB's conclusion that Boeing acted unlawfully when it decided to build a new plant in South Carolina after failing to reach an agreement with union leadership in Washington state. Some of the claims are obviously one-sided, some of the views expressed are extreme, and anger seems to bubble through at time, none of which is surprising given that the author is the CEO of Boeing. Nevertheless, the letter clearly conveys Boeing's position, and provides ample opportunity for a thoughtful response.

Interesting thumbnail sketch of candidates' performance in the first GOP primary debate. Doesn't work that well as stand-alone journalism; you have to have been following the race to understand these brief notes. But it does provide an interesting perspective.

More details about the attack that led to bin Laden's death.

A readable summary of event leading up to the raid on the compound where Bin Laden was killed. Perhaps tries too hard to follow the spy story genre it alludes to up front, and relies too heavily on Brennan's account. But does provide some interesting details.

Results of another recent survey about gender-based income disparities.

Not much news here. A few quotes about the potential long-term consequences and a few anecdotes about the local recovery, but pretty bland all in all.

Straightforward coverage of an interesting case. Arguments from both sides are presented along with evidence concerning their plausibility. The Times also acknowledges that it has publicly endorsed one side in the case.

This reads more like a press release announcing a new book than journalism. Although several prominent political figures are named, the only source appears to be the author of book to which the story links. The only indication that the journalist did any independent reporting comes near the end of the article: "Last night, BP and Shell declined to comment". The story is particularly disappointing because of the importance of the issue. I would love to read some serious investigative journalism on this topic. It is possible that the advertised book provides important new evidence, but this article does little to help us evaluate the book's claims.

A thoughtful and carefully argued opinion. Agree or not, the claims are stated clearly and the logic of the argument is easy to follow.

Appears to be based on a university press release without additional reporting. A better story would include reactions from others in the physics community or solar industry.

A overview of why some Democratic legislators are disappointed with the Obama administration. Would be improved by giving more information about the prevalence of this discontent. Evidence of broad erosion of support is a bit weak: there's "some" grumbling, Pelosi "sounded miffed", one anonymous lawmaker wants to replace him.

Brooks describes what he believes are the five core differences between Obama's and Ryan's approach to addressing the growing budget deficit. The points are described very briefly, and can be critiqued for leaving out important details concerning both parties, but he refrains from name calling or demonization. He uses these differences to offer a common critique of the highly partisan political climate, and to make some predictions about how these politics will play out in the next election.

If you care about the political game -- who's got the best odds to win in this or that scenario -- then this is an entertaining read. If you don't, you probably want to skip it.

The author of this opinion piece makes the controversial claim that men and women are on equal footing in the job market. Her argument has two parts. First, the recession has hit men harder than women because female-dominated industries have been more insulated from its effects. Second, men and women earn equal pay for equal work. That is, the fact that women earn less than men on average is a consequence of their working fewer hours and choosing less difficult, more rewarding work--not because of discrimination. The latter claim appears to be a misinterpretation of the study cited, though. This is an opinion piece, so it should come as no surprise that the evidence is carefully selected to make the point, and ... More »

Focuses on the play-by-play coverage, more than the big picture, but does that fine.

A unique opinion piece looking at the U.S. from the outside. The author is critical of Dems and Repubs alike, and explains his reasoning simply and clearly.

Compliments Obama administration strategy while remaining strongly critical of Democrats' budget proposal. At the same time, it provides a compelling portrait of potential factions with the Republican party. The summary of the Ryan-authored Republican budget is one-sided, but that's fair game in an opinion piece.

A brief summary of recent developments at the damaged Japanese nuclear reactors. It covers several different topics, jumping abruptly from one to the next. I may understand the situation a bit better, but the presentation of information could be better.