I wrote this story. It's an opinion piece so obviously it won't be 100% fair...

This could be because I am such a young and fairly inexperience journalist but when the writer says someone "snapped" a response instead of said, that bothers me.

"One recent morning" sounds like someone didn't do their reporting. It took 13 graphs to reach a real quote.

Never heard of the publication, layout and Web site look a little iffy. Not very professional looking.

I think sources could have been identified better and it was fairly wordy, the paragraphs were long. Most people like to skim, and this is not easy to skim.

I didn't see any comments from the windmill companies and experts who say it's good for those to be there and not bad for the neighborhoods.

I only think it's somewhat fair because while the sources were good and many were used across the board, when saying "government officials" and "industry observers" wasn't descriptive enough for me.

I would have liked another source that opposed the flooding procedure.