ThThis is a major issue and it was covered very well. I like how the author included details about section 222 of the Communications Act, relevant pieces of historical information, direct quotes from each of the major players, and most of all I like how he/she told some of the functioning details of how the operations are being carried out. For example, NSA is requesting that the major telecommunication companies keep them updated on future calling data. I also think that it is balanced by addressing the fundamental difference in opinion, which is that Bush’s side is that the executive chief has the authority to override laws whereas civil liberty groups believe that the administration should work from within the structure of ... More »

The Author based everything around his/her opinion. Some good info was presented but overall it was based on their opinion. Nothing was written about environmental impacts or any opposing view. Actually, given the title it should have addressed more energy topics outside liquid forms; such as solar, wind, hydro, etc… It also lack some vital detail that may be offered by scientist; mostly because it didn’t address anything from a scientific point of view. Overall it had the feeling of a persuasive augments rather than an informational; much like he/she was using facts to support his/her opinion. Though some good points where addressed; it was not balanced what so ever; especially given the title of the article.