Reputable publication; article itself is well written, gives context, and is well sourced.

Well written, well-sourced article from a reputable news publication.

Well written article from a reputable source. Shows relevant context and expert opinions.

Though lacking in expert citations and outside opinions, article is very informative and concise.

Well written article, with sources and context. The publication itself is relatively trustworthy.

Article is from a reputable source. The article itself is well written, with enough citations from experts on the matter.

SHort and concise, however not enough context. On the other hand,in terms of current events on the issue the story has reported as much as possible in a non-biased manner.

Well written article with expert testimony. However, the source of the article isnot too well known, and as such the factuality of the article is naturally put under greater question.

Well written and non-biased article from an extremely reputable source. Simply reports what is and does not infuse the article with unnecessary biases. Gives great context and data tables on the issue at hand.

Professionally written, well sourced. Context and background fully developed.

No, the video is quite biased and one-sided. Furthermore i attempts to play off of one's emotions rather than simply explain the situation. It is in no way quality journalism.

While the topic of the article is relatively fascinating and under-reported, the author's writing itself is quite questionable. The article is highly sensationalized, and plays off from emotion far too much, which is most certainly not unbiased and factual as a good article should be. In short, though the author writes about a good topic, and even references relatively extensively, his writing is nothing short of unprofessional.