This is a first-person characterization of what went on. Good for including the video. However, it's not enough. We need to know the TSA side of the story. Why are these rules in place? What are the alternatives. Remember that a terrorist presumably would have brought down a plane with a bomb in his underwear last Christmas Day, had it exploded, which led to the xrays and "Junk-touching" So this, as the original author says in his subhead qualifies as a diatribe. Without balance, it's bad journalism. It is, however, an interesting first-person story. But first person stories are not what we're being asked to review here.
See Full Review »
(4 answers)




