This is a rticle with detailed information and well-organized sentences.It is a pity to lose those lead-paint funding but, things will change if this measure could reduce poisoning.
See Full Review »
(11 answers)
This is a rticle with detailed information and well-organized sentences.It is a pity to lose those lead-paint funding but, things will change if this measure could reduce poisoning.
I consider it as good journalism because it delivers information and display some details examples and data to hold and support the topic and the content is not diffficult to understand.
This article is not under good organization.Firstly, it pays too much attention to the disease data of last year while it could not demonstrate that the condition turns better this year.Furthermore, the article could not leave us some 'big image' and it even does not show a dangerous signal to those Oyster Fevers.