Although this story is promotional for Tennessee Valley Authority and may be partially advertising for a commercial operation, it is very timely and unique in bringing leading edge technology to the reader.

Yes, Striffler is pointing out that we need to take a deeper or at least alternative look at the Tuscon shooter and the influences around him.

Yes but the radio interview with Rep. Sanchez detracted from the printed article. This was Sanchez fault and not the interviewer.

Mr. Brooks presented a description of civility that we all can embrace.

Yes, it provided information not readily available.

Very well written and with all sides of controversy covered.

This article is a fine essay for anyone enthralled by george bush's mannerisms, vocabulary, speech patterns and visual attractiveness. It is not a report of any substantial new facts that will have any long time bearing on his legacy.

Beautifully written and concise. The author has stuck to known facts to present a viewpoint held by many in India. Facts are being reported while not injecting any obvious personal bias.

I leave the judging of this story up to the reviewers. I apologize if this is not the correct way to post one's own document.

Comprehensive, concise and written with care.

Intense reply to a series of articles and comments by a host of Newsvine contributors.

Yes. The raising of questions from wide viewpoints is always proper. This article is almost all question and little substance on its own. The benefits of this type article are most evident in the comments rather than the body.

Yes. A very sleek and well written document as would be expected of a PR piece issued by the pinnacle of the Military Industrial Complex. The article contains very important information presented in a way that will escape the attention of the general public.

Yes. This article could have been more expansive about Dobson and his minions. Dobson has managed to head one of the most intrusive yet profitable organizations in the country all under the guise of a religious oriententation.

Yes. This article covers the subject from the left without stooping to tactics often seen in material from the right. It is also presented with sufficient supportive links to make it more complete than I may have indicated in this review.

Yes, well written, brings to light an aspect of story not prominent elsewhere. Follow up comments bring fullness to subject.

Yes. The kudos for good writing and technical structure should go to Senator Gordon Smith. Justin Rood should be given credit for good journalism in reporting the speech to a wider audience than might have occurred without his effort.

Yes, it provides an opinion in a respectable manner that can be accepted my many. It also leaves open a whole area of what Democrats should be doing, where their priorities should be.

Yes, its journalistic aspects are excellent. Its conclusions and opinion may require more US involvement than possible if the US is forced to retire from the field.

No. This story may present an accurate exchange between reporters and the President's Press Aide yet provides no definitive purpose for the article. If completely accurate the story reflects the sad state of journalism both inside and out at the White House door.

Concise, well thought out, and well crafted article with sufficient sourcing to carry the author's point to a logical conclusion.

Yes. This is more like a booklet and too long for most newspapers or magazines. Very informative and covers a man little known to much of the US. It reads like a biography of a portion of a man's life. Well written.

Yes, very well written; factual with little or no indication of author's personal opinion.

Yes. Concise, comprehensive and orderly in construction and thought.

Concise and comprehensive. A very simple explanation of a very convoluted career.

"From 2004 to 2006, Bush turned victory into dust. What will two more years of Bush bring?" The one flaw in the article. In my opinion the dust was there long before 2004. So were the seeds of Bush's defeat. He is a defeated President, you know?

This is a tough one for me. I am too close to the subject.

Journalistic excellence with a poor coverage of the real problem, getting people to do or even understand the energy crisis we face.

This article suffers from grammar errors and poor phrasing which may be because the writer is using English as a second language. I discern a certain accent in the dialog. However, if this is citizen journalism, it is very good. The sourcing and linking are outstanding.

Very drab article on a rather drab subject.

Very well written, covers subject well, site requires sponsor click.

Yes. The written article is the script of a TV newscast. There is always a need for the written transcript.

Journalism outstanding, site presentation among the best.

I am well aware this same article could have been written about several Ohio races. I was personally involved in a Special Primary in Ohio that I witnessed many violations by BOE's.

The opinions in this story appear to reflect a phrase I read here on NewsTrust. Get enough votes (ratings) and a true picture will emerge.