I think that this article is good journalism because it successfully gets the point of the article across. The writer uses a lot of statistics to back up the information. Also it is an interesting article because it talks about new products and developments.

I think that this is article is relevant to the audience it is trying to reach. Although it is not thoroughly researched there are still sources from the student body and also professors that support both sides of the argument. The story is newsworthy because it is compelling and timely.

This article is good journalism because it pertains relevant informationa and is very informative. It speaks of the predsident's efforts in making the school a better place, but it also includes things he has failed to do. The article is well sourced and enterprising.

I did not think this was good journalism because although it did state the facts there was no real story behind it. The title announces the main idea of the story and the idea was only touched on. The story did not hold my interest and was not very well sourced.

The story is not good journalism because there are little sources and mostly biased against the royal wedding. Although there are facts against the wedding itself it seems the writer does not intend to watch the wedding festivities either.

I think this is good journalism because it states all the facts and includes both sides of the story. The story is relevant because it happened within the week and it has notable sources. Also this is a trusted publication and the article itself is well written.

This story was very entertaining and talks about the pressing issue of media taking over our lives. I enjoyed reading about the journalist's challenge and also would encourage others to partake in it as well. I was shocked to hear about the emails he received about withdrawal symptoms over a twitter account, and this makes it very clear how dependent we are on social networking.

The article has a good amount of sources to back up the argument. I think that the writer could have done more research to talk about what kind of programs are being used to stop the corrupt governments. This article has an interesting topic, but the way it was written did not hold my attention.

I believe this is good journalism because the reporter has several notable sources for information. Also both sides of the argument are portrayed equally.

I thought that this article was very informative and filled with data. Also I believe that more sources could have been used to make the article more effective. Overall the story was well researched and to the point.

This article was very informative and gave a play by play of the incident in depth. There were sources from both sides and it was a heartfelt topic which attracts an audience.

I thought the story was well written, but it was a little all over the place. One moment the author would talk about dancers and the next viewers. There are many different things going on in this article which is confusing to read.

I think that the title of the article is misleading because the author only used the president's name to attract an audience. The article had very little to do with the president. Also the story was not based on reliable sources and seems biased against the Brazilian laborers.