My review makes the article look better than it actually is. The article is factual, relevant and does show a certain amount of context but it uses the chinese government as an infallible source.

The article is little more than a repetition of the speech that the prime minister made in his private jet, leaving me wondering why the author wrote the article in the first place. The whole point seemed to be that the world didn't mind India's rise, and the only source was the president himself. The last sentence seemed to have nothing at all to do with the rest of the article.

The story gives a one-sided view, showing only the oil company's views and not actually a well-rounded anything.

Well written but a bit short.

The story was okay but I was left wondering what the point of the story was. While it wasn't badly written it seemed odd to choose Kenya specifically (although granted, they do seem to be a bit of an extreme case for a non-European country). The article just felt unnecessary, and the topic could have been dealt with better in a larger article about the volcano in general.

While the story is clearly (and unsurprisingly) taking the side of the protesters, there are no other major issues. Well written and I felt like I had a clear understanding of the topic

Well written and it makes a good argument. I will say that, as somebody who doesn't understand economics very much, I had quite a bit of trouble understanding some of it.