In terms of social capital, depending on the community the article shows their possible reaction to Graham's call. Conservatives would agree with Graham's argument to destroy Iran's military and Airforce, while Liberals are already against the war and would fight the Conservative argument to keep from spending more money on the military. The journalism just reports what Lindsay Graham said, but there is still bias with only mentioning what the Republicans would say.

Very bias, not so good for journalism in terms of balance but great with public forum. This sets the stage for an argument between liberals and conservatives, as well as businesses who may lose half their workers. Regarding social capital, communities would respond with anger with the racial profiling part, creating trouble and it would make it crucially unsafe once illegal immigrants come back in through other connections.

the information is well sourced, but we already know this is going on. there isnt much of a balance, I feel the pain of this unemployment depression. Transparency needs to be more clearer with the percentages used. This definitely opens up public forum.

This aticle was well written, and well sourced (transparency). The author did a wonderful job with details, from the start to end. This is good journalism since it provided information from all angles, without bias. It shows accuracy with the dates and people mentioned. This definitely causes good public forum. It is also independent, setting the scene straight with Seth's suicide. The author also did a great job with editorial separation, avoiding any guidance or church and state.