This article did not represent good journalism in any way. The information included in the article was not factual considering that it did not verify or make the reader actually believe that "the rumor can now be put to rest." There was only one source included in the entire article, and the source was not even Mfume himself; yet it was a councilman named D'adamo. Not only was this article poorly souced and lacked plenty of information and factuality, but it was not a well written article. The article was difficult to read because I found it very confusing. I should not be left asking any questions at the end of a read, and with this, I was questioning a lot.

The article topic was a great pick, considering it is very relevant to college life today. "Hooking up" is a huge deal with teenagers. The article had many different soucres which it referred to, and all of which would be credible in this situation considering it is all based on opinion and who thinks what about "hooking up". However, the article seemed to jump around a bit, which made it a little difficult to follow, but overall it was an enjoyable read.

This was good journalism because it was a real news account and real enterprising facts about the tornado, and the damanges that it caused. The article was strictly facts which is what the whole purpose of this article was; to inform people of the tornado. It was relevant because it was current news, and it had in-depth details.

I thought this was great journalism. The article was obviously very enterprising and interesting to me considering that I go to Towson University. The article was well written and had plenty of reliable and credible soucres.

This was a great article topic to write about right now since it is so new and current. I had only heard about this incident brifely on tv; but this article gave me a lot more great information and more details about the terrible attack. The article was very well sourced and showed a lot of content.

I thought this was a great article. It had a lot of extremely good information that related to the article in every way. Every piece of imformation was thoroughly cited; which made the article very credible. The article relates to society today and how technology is becoming more advanced; which results is a relevant article.

This article was very relevant considering that Opening Day had just passed. The information that was included in the article was all great information, however there could have been more. It was all facts, and only one of them was cited. If the article had more context and more in-depth information it could have been much better. The journalism was good though; very professional.

I thought this was very good journalism, with the exception of a few minor things. The article was very interesting, and it was something that I had not been aware of, so it was very insightful for me. It was very well written, with excellent writing skills. The article could have been a little better if more credible sources were cited.

I think that the article was very well written, however it seemed to be a little confusing to understand. I think the oranization of the article could have been better thought out and planned. It was very relevant considering St. Patricks Day was the most recent holiday, however I think there could have been more creditable sources within the article. The writing style was excellent, and it started off very catchy, however it could have been more structured.

I think this was very nicely written and professional. All of the sources were legit and credible. Every quote was cited, and it was seemed to be really good information. The article started off well, with a catchy introduction.

I did not believe that this was good journalism. I think that the could have been better and had potential to be a great story, but the author did not make it compelling. It seemed very irrelevant. The concept of Obama did not seem to fit the story in any way. I was confused while reading it, and it did not make a lot of sense to me. I give props to the author for capturing attention at first by adding President Obama into the story, but he could of been better linked to the rest of the story.