The writer does not follow a particular structure for this story, which affects the audience's ability to hold onto details. This article needs lots of editing and more substantial facts. There are too many ideas mixed together, making the article hard to follow. Also, there are nolegitimate sources whose commnts correlate with the big idea of the story.

This article is very interesting. It provides a lot of information and aides to support the facts. It teaches the audience new information on some level. Also t iswell formatted and enjoyable.

It gives enough a lot of information that would draw an audience in. Also, it makes an audience want to take action by realizing how easy it is to help.

This article is not fair, but harmful and bias. Also, there is not enough evidence or facts to support the information provided. The ideas are not organized well. Statements are repetitive, unclear and unoriginal, questioning this story's newsworthiness.

This is good journalism. The story has transparency and statistical evidence to support the statements. There are also tons of sources relevant to the issue. The opinions of teachers, professors, parents, and city officials create competency. More school teachers could have been quoted, but the sources provided had useful information. The story was also fair by acknowledging both the hesitancy and support of the teachers. The information comes full circle for a cohesive story.