There aren't many sources and it's not very well explained. The average person would have trouble understanding the content of the story.

This article is good journalism, because there are many credible sources and quotes from the FDA commissioner. It proposes a plan to fight obesity in the U.S., which is extremely relevant since it is a pressing concern. It also is in depth and explains the proposed law in detail.

The article was very informative, because he is a star athlete. It's good to know that he has arthritis if he doesn't play up to his fans' expectations. An doctor commented on his condition, so we know that one of the sources is credible.

I enjoyed reading the article. I wish there was mention of the name of the study in the lead of the article. I also wish there was more of an explanation of what the study tested and how they did so. It's relevant since many people are living with bipolar disorders.

I really like this article, however, I wish there was slightly more information about the GOP sources and an explanation why they're anonymous. It gives insight about the Medicaid expansion, and it seems like the other sources are accurate. I'm looking forward to hearing more about this heated topic.

As a reader, I would like to know more about funding for health programs abroad and for community clinics. There was too much talk about compassionate conservatism and George W. Bush. Instead, I would like to have learned more about the current relevance of the story.