This is quality journalism because it's not one sided. It''s sources are also very reliable and it's well written.

No it lacks depth & quality.

this is really great quality journalism because it breaks everything down. The author gives you sub-headings and a great fair explanation of what each thing means.

I think it's written very poorly because it's not written in a story form but just random facts that don't flow.

I believe it is. The writers give a lot of evidence & history to support what they are saying